Chris Kluwe: Word Warrior, Freedom Fighter

Chris Kluwe. Photo by Mike Hnida

Chris Kluwe is a 30-year old punter for the Minnesota Vikings.  He’s a husband to Isabel, a father to two little girls, a bassist in Tripping Icarus, a gaming enthusiast, a Twitter phenom (@ChrisWarcraft), and a freedom fighter.  Using his words to point out inequalities and inconsistencies in the public sphere, Kluwe skyrocketed to our attention as his retorts went viral on the internet.  First, he took on a Maryland delegate, Emmett Burns, who criticized Ravens player Brendon Ayanbedejo for supporting same-sex marriage; recently, his response earned him a citation from Maryland delegate Sheila Hixon for “standing up for equality for all.”  Then, among other pieces he’s written lately, Kluwe logically argued down the stance of former Viking Matt Birk, who publicly claimed that same-sex marriage would be detrimental to children. Most recently (as of press time…but I’m guessing there will have been more epic letters since), he fired off a letter to the Pope and Archbishop Nienstedt for various reasons, not the least of which were for mixing their role as a church with taking a political stance as well as writing a letter to a mother indicating that her eternal salvation may be at risk if she doesn’t reconsider her request for acceptance of her gay son.

Taking all of these points into consideration, you can see why I politely declined all offers to help me prepare for this interview with Chris Kluwe by giving me a few football pointers.  No, we weren’t going to be talking about football.

Read on.

Andy Lien: Prepping for this piece, I had to do some homework.  Turns out, there’s a whole lot about you out there.  You do a lot.  What have you been doing in the media lately?  How do we find you?

Chris Kluwe: Mainly on Twitter at my @ChrisWarcraft is where I do the bulk of my rabble-rousing, I guess.  I have a blog at the Pioneer Press, Out of Bounds, and various radio interviews.  If you want to get in contact with me, Twitter is usually the best way to go.  I read all of my replies–I may not respond to all of them–but I do read all of them.

AL: Are you a regular on the radio?

CK: Yeah, the 93X Half-Ass Morning Show…I’m a pretty regular guest on there; this year I’m on every Tuesday around 7:30am.  People can listen to me not talk about football.

AL: Your appearance on “Wait Wait…Don’t Tell Me” this past weekend was hilarious.  “Punters are the bassists of football…” that was great.  You’re a punter and you’re the bassist for Tripping Icarus. How did you come out wailing like you did against this Marriage Amendment?

CK: I was involved with Minnesotans for Marriage Equality.  They had contacted me through Twitter and said, “Hey, would you be interested in helping us out?”  I looked at the amendment and said, “Yeah, this seems like the right thing to do, to help defeat this amendment.”  Because it’s taking away people’s freedoms, it’s taking away people’s right to live their life free of oppression.  So, I’d been involved with them…recorded a couple of radio ads…and then I saw the story of the Maryland delegate who sent the letter to the Ravens.  I read the letter and I was like, “Wow…that’s messed up.”  Can I swear?  I said, “Wow, that’s fucked up.”  I went to bed because it was around 11:30 at night and I had to wake up for practice the next morning.  I was lying in bed and I can’t get to sleep because I’m just thinking about this letter. I had to write something down or else I wouldn’t be able to sleep.  So I went to my computer, typed out the essay to Mr. Burns in about an hour, and sent it off to a couple of guys at Dead Spin because they’ve published some of my other stuff and I’ve been involved in some of their round table/slate discussion for football this year.  They posted it at 2:00 the next day.  All the sudden I checked my Twitter and there were 400 mentions. 800 mentions. 1600 mentions.  I was like, “Whoa…someone’s reading it.”

AL: As I saw people intro-ing the link on Facebook, I kept seeing, “Now I’ll have to start watching the Vikings” or “Now I have a new favorite Viking.”  Did you expect that the Vikings would see an increase in popularity out of saying this?

CK: [Laughs] No.  I really didn’t.

AL: I know people are saying you shouldn’t because you’re with the Vikings.

CW: Yeah, that was one of the things that people would say, “Hey, the language…could you have not used quite the colorful words?”  So, that’s why I also released the censored version of it.  The “sparklepony” version of it.  But, I never thought they would get people interested in the Vikings. That’s great–it’s more people to cheer on the team.

AL: As far as role models go, there are just a handful of out pro athletes. None in the NFL.  Do you predict more might be coming out? Or aren’t there as many?

CK: I think so.  I’d say there’s probably two to three guys in the NFL that are playing right now–I don’t know who they would be but simple statistics state that there are people in the NFL.  My hope is that one day, guys’ll feel comfortable enough to be who they are…not to have to worry about “Does my sexuality matter?” “Does my religion matter?” or “Does my race matter?”  What matters is, “Can you play on Sunday?”  “Can you help us win?”  That’s what sports should be about.  Hopefully, what I’m doing, what Brendon’s [Ayanbadejo] doing, what Connor Barwin and Scott Fujita are doing is helping change that culture to make other guys realize that who you choose to marry–who you choose to sleep with–doesn’t matter when it comes to football.

AL: Not coming out can actually be detrimental.  After people come out, they can actually perform better in sports.  The psychological weight is lifted.

CK: There’s not as much stress.  I think it was Mark Cuban who said, “Whoever comes out first is going to have the greatest marketing opportunity ever.”  Because there are so many companies involved, especially in the NFL and Major League Baseball–do you think Nike and Gatorade wouldn’t want to be involved in the greatest civil rights moment of this era?  That’d be like getting Jackie Robinson to represent your product.  It’s not just the right thing to do from a human rights standpoint, but from a commercial standpoint you could make millions.  It’s unbelievable.

AL: Okay, so Matt Birk.  We all have Matt Birks in our lives.  The ones about whom we think, “You’re very thoughtful…you’re very conscientious…you’re very intelligent.”  When he came out against marriage equality, there were many of us who were surprised.  I saw time and time again, “I thought he was smarter than that.”  What do we do about the Matt Birks in our lives?

CK: You have to give them factual, statistical arguments that you can back up and ask them to argue the same way.  Don’t be satisfied with an appeal to emotion or an appeal to fear.  Those aren’t valid arguing techniques.  Give me something concrete that I can look at and reason or argue with.  The thing is, when you say that it’s about the children and then you don’t give any facts why it’s about children, where’s your argument? You’re basically saying, “This makes me feel uncomfortable so we should get rid of it.”  But that’s not a good enough reason to deny a segment of American citizens federal benefits and rights under the law.  It’s discrimination.

AL: When you made the point to Matt Birk that “it does affect your kids in case one of them is gay,” that’s where I thought we might see that they could come around. They should probably come around to this–the intelligent, conscientious folks–and that might be where. Do you think they will? Is it generational?

CK: I think it will be.  If you look at it historically, societies tend to move toward more freedom, not less, as long as things stay reasonably stable in the society.  You look at segregation today and then back to 50 years ago and wonder, “What were they thinking? Why was this ever an issue?”  50 years from now–30 years from now–our kids are going to grow up and wonder, “What were they thinking?  Why was this an issue?”

AL: This is an emotionally charged issue.  This past year in the campaign against this amendment, people have been asked to have conversations and share their stories. What advice would you give people as they have these very difficult discussions?

CK: I’d say that when you talk to someone make sure they’re aware that you do respect that they have the right to believe what they want to believe but, at the same time, that this is an issue that strikes at the very core of what it means to be an American citizen.  In America, everyone pays taxes, everyone has the opportunity to serve in the military, and everyone can defend the freedoms and rights of the country.  And, you are entitled the same rights and privileges under the law as everyone else.  If you look at any sort of legal argument from the past for segregation, Plessy v. Ferguson, separate but equal doesn’t work.  American citizens should all be treated as American citizens.  When you deny someone their rights, you are effectively saying, “You are not as good of a human being as I am.  You are less than I am.  You don’t deserve the same protections that I do.”  And that’s just wrong. That’s not what America stands for.

AL: Part of that is coming out for some people–letting others know that you are who you are and that it affects you.

CK: Exactly.  We all live together in this nation. America’s inclusive–it’s not exclusive. We’re all in this together.

AL: I’ve been noticing an overwhelming sense of gratitude in the community–relief–when people share what you’ve written.  You’ve become a spokesman for them.  I’ve also noticed this rallying behind you, that you’ve struck such a chord and done so consistently.  My question is, what’s next for you?  Is there a Chris Kluwe for public office in our future?

CK: [Laughs] I don’t know if you saw my tweets last night [during the first presidential debate] but I’m not a real big fan of our political system. To me, there are some very fundamental instabilities in our political system right now that really need to be overhauled.  If you look at historical trends from various empires, it doesn’t end well.  The barbarians are always at the gates…and they’ll get in, eventually.  So, politics-wise, I have no plans for running for political office.  I’d like to keep writing–you know, pointing out stuff that doesn’t make sense. I’ve always felt that you should treat others the way you want to be treated.  A lot of life would be a lot easier for a lot of people if they just followed the Golden Rule. If you’re going to do something, ask yourself, “What would it feel like if someone else did that to me?” Then, if you look at it like, “I wouldn’t want someone else to do that to me,” don’t do it to anyone else.

AL: Right.  Easy. You’d think.

CK: You’d think.

AL: This is the final question.  You’ve been here since 2005, what do you think is going to happen in this election?

CK: If I could predict the future, I’d buy a Powerball ticket. What I hope will happen is that Minnesota will defeat this amendment because 31 other states haven’t been able to and it really is a disturbing sign that other states have felt that they need to oppress a certain segment of their population, of American citizens, and deny them equal benefits under the law.  Eventually, at some point, the Supreme Court is going to look at it and say that these are frankly unconstitutional–you’re using religious arguments to try and influence secular matters.  That is a violation of the First Amendment.  So, I hope that Minnesota will be the first state that says, “Look, we are not going to oppress our citizens. We’re going to realize that every citizen in this state is here for the betterment of the state. And we’re not going to say that just because you want to get married to someone of the same sex or just because you have a different religion or just because you have a certain skin color that we’re going to deprive you of your rights.”  Hopefully, we’ll defeat this.

From the Editor

When I was in high school, I was called “The Bulldog” by a real-life judge on the Mock Trial circuit.  I loved to debate.  I would wail on and pick at your arguments until they were annihilated.  It was a rush.  I was good at it.

One of the bigger arguments I can recall was when I took a resolution that I wrote for my 9th grade Civics class to the School Board and requested that condom machines be installed in our bathrooms.  That was a little progressive for our conservative school district circa 1991, but I felt vindicated when I got to Macalester four years later and they were giving them out in candy dishes in the campus health center.

Condoms for high schoolers was a shocking concept.  I don’t recall being taken seriously at the School Board meeting, but I do remember being allowed to state my case.  I have to give the school credit for that—not only did my class vote this case to be the one to be presented to the School Board, but the School Board didn’t censor the presentation.  Kudos all around.

The request for condom machines was denied.  Providing condoms would lead to more teenagers having sex.

Would it?  No, it would not.  That’s fallacious.  Teenagers are already having sex; therefore, it would give them the safety measures that are necessary to do so safely.  Making condoms available doesn’t force or encourage someone to have sex—or even use them if they are having sex.  That was a preposterous argument, in my mind.  I didn’t want to see even an iota of validity in it, because I wanted to win my case.

Putting a bowl of candy on the table doesn’t mean more people will eat them and gain weight; it means more people can have candy.  Putting Bibles in drawers at hotels doesn’t mean people will have to convert to whatever religion the Gideons are part of; it means that you can look at a Bible if you’re bored or curious in your hotel room.  Putting bright green bikes out for rental on city streets doesn’t mean that we’ll all be forced to exercise and give up our vehicles; it means that you have a healthier option for transportation.

There are plenty such arguments like this that the 15-year old Andy could make.  All day long.  Until your ears bleed.

But, the 35-year old Andy has caught on to the validity of the School Board’s point.  Presenting an idea or option can be seen as endorsing it.

Allowing kids to take condoms is a stark contrast to condemning underage, premarital sex.  By not condemning teen sex, it implies that it can exist–it might be saying that it’s okay.  You won’t go to hell.  Shockingly, nothing at all might happen to you (especially if you use the condoms).

Is that how it works for coming out or approving same-sex rights and marriages?  By not condemning same-sex relationships, it implies that this community can exist—it might be saying that it’s okay.  People who are attracted to people of the same-sex won’t go to hell.  Shockingly, nothing at all might happen to you.

Where the two arguments depart is in the next step: encouragement.  Providing condoms for kids might encourage them to have sex: Not true. Acceptance might not mean encouragement.  Providing rights for people in same-sex relationships might encourage them to come out: True.

Right?

I hope so.

It’s like a problem posed in a Philosophy course.  Ethics, morals, dichotomies…a whole lot of grey area and conjecture.  I don’t necessarily hope that teenagers see a bowl of condoms as an encouragement to go have sex…but I hope that people who have been in the closet see acceptance of the GLBT community as an encouragement to come out.  The difference is that one argument might lead to an action; having sex.  The other argument might lead to the recognition of an identity; coming out as GLBT.

Teen sex is nothing new.  Same-sex relationships aren’t new either, but with some people, it seems like they just sprang to the fore.  And the subject is scary to those people because it’s unknown.  One of the many problems with this situation is that despite how long same-sex relationships have existed, people who are new to the concept are being allowed to vote on the subject.  They have followed the argument to the point that to allow these relationships could encourage them, but haven’t made the next step to see that coming out is good.  They don’t understand that encouraging people to claim their identity is healthy and it benefits our culture.  They’re mired in fear.

And, because they are afraid, they seek a fallacy of protection:

Put an amendment in the constitution limiting marriage to one man and one woman.  Tell the parishioners that their eternal salvation is at risk if they don’t stop seeking equal marriage rights for same-sex couples–bully them into choosing this legislation on their ballots when they exercise their right to vote.  By not allowing it, it won’t exist.

Really, “The Bulldog” might not be in retirement.  35 is a little young for that.  But, I appreciate that age has given me more perspective to be able to have more conversations than arguments.  Whether calmly or with a bite of debate, people need to be told the basics: There is a separation between church and state; this will not affect heterosexual marriages; accepting homosexuals will not turn you into one. And, really, bullies need to be called out on their shit.

With hope and thanks,

Andy

31 Days of Hallowonline: Wabasha Street Caves

If there are two things I dig as an internet voyeur and researcher, they are local lore and couchtrip urban exploration. Stories of haunting and intrigue in the Twin Cities and abandoned or now-demolished landmarks throw me down rabbit holes of adventure for hours.  Shows on SyFy about paranormal investigations and ghost hunting usually pique my interest as, if nothing else, something to consider as a possibility…ghosts, spirits, the others.  I’m a social scientist.  I’ll entertain just about any notion, particularly ones that are the slightest bit exciting.

The Twin Cities have a variety of local haunts for people with similar interests in the paranormal.  From what I’ve read over the years, there’s a young lady ghost at Forepaugh’s who is the spirit of a spurned young maid who killed herself in the mansion. I used to walk my dog past the Griggs Mansion on Summit Avenue when I lived nearby in St. Paul which is apparently the most haunted house in the region (and it’s still on the market for a lucky buyer).  While I doubt I could finagle a tour of the Griggs Mansion from a realtor, we can get our fix for curiosity and creepiness at the third most haunted location in Minnesota, the Wabasha Street Caves in St. Paul.

The Wabasha Street Caves are sandstone caves in St. Paul that are currently used as an event space for weddings, proms, and murder mysteries…in addition to weekly swing dancing. Host of multiple tours in St. Paul from gangsters to graves and ghosts, visitors can ride buses narrated by actors pointing out the locations of historical relevance…or take tours on foot, such as the Historical Cave Tour or Lost Souls Tour. On a sunny day in October, a friend and I stepped into the dank darkness for the Lost Souls Tour ($10 for 1hr) given at 12:30pm on the last Sunday of each month, with additional days in October (check the schedule).

Having already taken one of the St. Paul Gangster Tours, I knew I was in for a quality experience, with a little bit of self-aware camp thrown in.  The wry, accented Nurse did not disappoint.  She’s called the Nurse because she’s always dressed like a nurse.  Or so she says.  Each tour, whether on bus or on foot, is led by other such actors who lend a bit more flair to the historical drama or, in this case, the haunted drama.  Walking into the Caves, we had to pause for a few minutes to let our eyes adjust to the dark.  I was surprised by, even though I knew a candlelit tour would be dark, just how dark it would be the entire time.  Depending on the surrounding surfaces and whether or not light reflected off of them, it was fairly nice and creepy the whole time.

Then, the Nurse told us about the app.  It was about to get creepier.  Pulling out my iPhone, I downloaded that app faster than you can say “Wabasha.”  Ghost Radar by Spud Pickles is a free download and was to indicate where there are disturbances in our surroundings, as well as any words that are picked up as being said by something otherworldly.  Well, tickle me pink.

Trying to listen to the Nurse and monitor my glowing Ghost Radar turned out to be a bit too much for me and I pocketed it for a while so I could hear more of the background of the caves and some of the experiences had in them by previous owners and even some of the current staff.  Fascinating.  I won’t commit any spoilers here, but when standing in a space in the dark that has a storied past that involves gunshots that are still pockmarking the walls, I’m fairly suggestible.  Add a fairly credible-though-comical actress to vouch for the stories and I’m listening with rapt attention.

Walking through the various rooms of the Caves in the near-dark, it’s easy also understand how the mind can play tricks on the visitors.  Heck, I had an iPhone in my pocket that was about to mess with my head even more as soon as I took it out, thanks to the stories I was hearing.  Finally feeling like I could be able to multi-task listening to the Nurse while staring at my Ghost Radar, I turned it on, let it get a baseline, and watched for any blips on the screen.  I even had the presence of mind to do some screen grabs:

The blips on the screen indicated where there was a disturbance in the baseline readings of the room.  I watched as we walked and there were times when the radar was blank…and there were times when colored blips indicated different strengths of disturbance, or presence.  With one ear on the narration and two eyes on the glow, I wasn’t too uptight about what I was seeing.  That was, until I saw this one.

Red is the strongest signal and this one was right behind me.  Or it was me.  I don’t know.  It made the hair on my arms stand on end.

There was a kid on the tour who was using his parents’ iPhone to use Ghost Radar and I kept looking over his shoulder like I was cheating on a test, trying to see if I was getting the same information as he was.  He mentioned that his Radar was giving him words and I was immediately jealous.  I hadn’t gotten any communication yet.  The Nurse, perhaps sensing my covetousness, clarified that kids are often communicated with more than adults.  Fair enough.

Imagine my surprise when I suddenly got this series of screens:

See the words at the top in the middle?  Nothing of what the Nurse was saying involved these words at this time and nobody else was speaking.  I think, if I recall correctly, she was talking about an encounter that her daughter had in the Caves at the time these words popped up on my screen: research, development, Louis, before.  Not wanting to disrupt the tour, I decided to ask about these words later.

Without the app, the tour is interesting and varied with a look at photographs that have documented what can be considered evidence of ghosts or spirits in the Wabasha Street Caves.  With the app, it’s just a wee bit more interesting adding unpredictability to the hour-long experience.  I would have enjoyed it either way.  Wrapping up the tour with a slideshow of guest-submitted photographs was a nice touch of not-quite-so-anecdotal evidence.  Seeing what has caught the eyes of people over the years brings it a little closer to home that any one of us might encounter someone from the other side while in the Caves…especially since some of the ghosts are particularly fond of various locations in the Caves or circumstances, like playing swing music.

Coming to the end of our hour as we ventured out into the sun and people went to their cars. I asked the Nurse if the word “Louis” meant anything in the history of the Wabasha Street Caves.  She said that “Louie” did.  I was a little bummed until she spelled it, “L-o-u-i-s.”

B-i-n-g-o.

Louis was French.

The Nurse explained that Louis Lambert was among the first to develop the Caves from being a mine for silica to being a place to grow mushrooms in the 1890s.  I did the research: Before it was a speakeasy and bar, it was a development in which Louis Lambert grew mushrooms.  See what I did there?  Italics help.

Yeah.  Sometimes, evidence corroborates stories that we want to believe…and sometimes stories are built out of evidence.  Either way you look at it, I’m sitting here at 11:24 at night in my loft which was renovated from an old warehouse…and I will not turn on that Ghost Radar to see what it has to tell me about my home.

Some things are better left unknown.

Get to know the Lost Souls of the Wabasha Street Caves in St. Paul.  It’ll be worth your while.

Wabasha Street Caves
215 Wabasha Street S
St. Paul, MN  55107
www.wabashastreetcaves.com
651.224.1191

From the Editor: Lavender Love

I’m in love with this issue.  Look at it.  The people, the places, the pictures, the people, the people, the people. But, I have terrible timing. Just as we wrapped up the voting for the Lavender 100 and scheduled photo sessions with the Community Members, I went on vacation.  Big mistake on my part as I missed seeing—and meeting—some of these wonderful people in our pages.

I love people.  As the editor, my priorities are clear: the Editorial Calendar reigns supreme, then the columns, then the stories that we find as we live our lives.  Most of the people fall into the third wave of coverage—our lives.  This time, though, when my Editorial Calendar gives me the FAB 50, I made some choices.  I decided to give us more categories, more winners, more people…100 of them, to be exactish.  More lives, more conversations, more people.

But, what I missed while I was gone were the conversations.  No, I don’t personally do our interviews on a regular basis, but I do personally talk to people.  That’s my favorite part of this job.  And Kathleen told me exactly what I missed while I was gone.

Hope.  She told me that of all the people she met, the most common theme was the hope they had that the community can look past its differences and become more unified.  What?  In a year when “Minnesotans United” has taken such a prominent role as an organization and as a theme?  Yes.
We need to own that.  Unity.

This is a community that has been tied together by rather disparate similarities.  The requirements for membership are more conceptual than actual, being based on sexual orientation and gender identity (and more…or less, depending on who you talk to).  What we face on a day-to-day basis is different from person to person.  And, getting to know each other is how we begin to understand how we’re actually similar from person to person.  Circumstances may not be the same, but struggles and triumphs can be.  So, in this issue, these people are just the tip of the iceberg for who we can look to as role models in seeing not only how we are all so different, but also how we can find pride in our unity.

We want that, right?
With hope and thanks,
Andy